refashioned: (why wouldn't i know best?)
veronica lodge ([personal profile] refashioned) wrote in [community profile] epidemiology 2018-02-19 10:08 pm (UTC)

No, giving in to their demands is only returning to the idea of civil war. They're mad because they didn't get the war. I don't think we should be worrying about the feelings of people who resort to violence against their leader.

You're talking about how naive I am, but you're also acting like a peace treaty is going to make these people any less likely to assault Nama. That's just ... [She shakes her head, clearly exasperated.]

Look. If you're against the marriage because you're concerned about these ... these rebels becoming angrier, then you really need to consider your priorities here. They resorted to violence. They resorted to trying to strip power away from Nama. The first declaration of these two coming together needs to be that these violent displays won't be acceptable, or they'll continue to happen. If Nama were deserving of the mutiny, maybe this would be a different conversation. But I hope you're rational enough to see that she isn't.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting